Experienced stone tool makers cannot figure out how a prehistoric tool was made just by looking at the finished product.
Prehistoric technology required direct social teaching because reverse-engineering a complex stone tool is almost impossible from the object alone. Anthropologists used to think that early humans could simply find a clever tool and copy it through trial and error. Experiments with modern knappers show that without being shown the specific technique, even experts fail to reproduce new designs. This means the spread of technology in the Palaeolithic era depended on deep social bonds and intentional instruction. Ancient innovation was a social achievement rather than just a series of individual inventions.
Reverse-engineering is not enough for inter-group transmission of novel palaeolithic knapping techniques
SocArXiv · qgzpr_v1
Identifying evidence of cultural transmission from archaeological artefacts is essential for reconstructing the dynamics of social interactions during prehistory. Although technological similarities among overlapping archaeological cultures are often interpreted as indicators of direct contact, the degree to which social interaction is necessary for the diffusion of knapping technologies remains debated. Transmission of technologies might, in some cases, result from the reverse-engineering of di